Introduction
Do news media strengthen or undermine democracy? What are the democratic consequences of fake news, negative campaigning, and uncivil political language? Can social media contribute to protest, repression, or even political violence?
The course approaches these questions through the interaction between three central actors in political communication: the media, political actors, and citizens. It examines how journalists select and frame political information; how politicians design campaigns and communication strategies; and how citizens acquire political knowledge, form opinions, participate in politics, and select the information they consume.
Throughout the course, classical theories are combined with recent empirical research, comparative cases, videos, podcasts, and current political events. Particular attention is paid to the fact that political communication is context-dependent: media systems, political institutions, electoral rules, and national contexts can fundamentally shape how communication works and what effects it has.
Learning goals
By the end of the course, students should be able to:
- Recognize and explain central concepts, theories, and empirical findings in political communication, and assess their strengths and limitations.
- Compare theories systematically, connect them to one another, and apply them to new examples and empirical evidence.
- Critically evaluate everyday claims about politics and media using political communication theory and research.
- Analyze the strategic choices and possible consequences of communication by politicians, journalists, interest groups, and citizens.
- Identify how political, institutional, and media contexts condition political communication processes and effects.
Course format
- An introductory session establishes the core concepts and historical development of political communication.
- Three foundational modules on media, political actors, and citizens are taught through guided self-study and web lectures, followed by an application class.
- Five advanced modules deepen the course through research on misinformation, polarization, populism and incivility, dissent and repression, and colonial legacies in news coverage.
- Application classes use integrative exercises modeled on the analytical reasoning required in the final assessment.
Main readings
- McNair (2011), Politics in the Age of Mediation
- McNair (2011), Politics, Democracy, and Media
Additional readings
- Kreiss & McGregor (2018), Technology Firms Shape Political Communication
- Mazzoleni & Schulz (1999), “Mediatization” of Politics: A Challenge for Democracy?
- Van Aelst et al. (2017), Political Communication in a High-Choice Media Environment
Course material
- Video: Werken de media de democratie tegen? [Do the media undermine democracy?]
Media: agenda-setting, priming, and framing
The first foundational module examines the media as an actor in political communication. It introduces three core mechanisms of media influence—agenda-setting, priming, and framing—and asks how they differ conceptually and empirically. The module also considers the direction of influence between politics and journalism: do media set the political agenda, do politicians shape the media agenda, or does influence run in both directions?
Comparative research illustrates how these processes operate across different political and media contexts, including Belgium, Sweden, Nigeria, and the changing social-media environment.
Main readings
- de Vreese (2005), News Framing: Theory and Typology
- Iyengar (2017), A Typology of Media Effects
- Scheufele & Tewksbury (2007), Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming
Additional readings
- Chong & Druckman (2007), Framing Theory
- Demarest et al. (2020), News Coverage of Religious-Based Violence — Nigeria
- Harder et al. (2017), Agenda-Setting in the Social Media Age
- Strömbäck et al. (2016), Do Politicians Lead the Tango? — Sweden
- Walgrave & Van Aelst (2006), Mass Media’s Political Agenda Setting Power
- Walgrave (2008), The Media’s Political Agenda-Setting Power — Belgium
Course material
- Video: Kan nieuws neutraal zijn? [Can news be neutral?]
Political actors: campaigning and political marketing
The second foundational module turns from journalism to political actors and organizations. It introduces political marketing and examines how politicians strategically communicate with voters. Particular attention is paid to negative campaigning, personalization, and the incentives that make some politicians more likely than others to adopt confrontational or simplified communication strategies.
The module also uses the Belgian cordon médiatique to examine the relationship between journalistic norms, political strategy, and the boundaries of legitimate political communication.
Main readings
- Coppock et al. (2020), The Small Effects of Political Advertising — United States
- Lees-Marshment (2009), Political Marketing
Additional readings
- Lau & Rovner (2009), Negative Campaigning
- Van Aelst et al. (2012), The Personalization of Mediated Political Communication
Course material
- News article and video: Cordon médiatique geschonden? [Has the media cordon been broken?]
- Podcast: LGBT Rights and the Politics of Visibility
Citizens: media effects and selective exposure
The third foundational module examines the public. It asks how news and digital media affect political knowledge, political trust, political participation, and political attitudes. It also considers the increasingly fragmented information environment: do citizens selectively expose themselves to congenial information, and to what extent do they actually live in partisan or ideological echo chambers?
The module connects classic work on motivated reasoning and selective exposure to newer evidence on digital media, political participation, knowledge gaps, and online news diets.
Main readings
- Boulianne (2020), Twenty Years of Digital Media Effects on Civic and Political Participation
- Haugsgjerd et al. (2022), Increased Media Choice and Political Knowledge Gaps
- Muise et al. (2021), Quantifying Partisan News Diets in Web and TV Audiences
- Taber & Lodge (2006), Motivated Skepticism
Additional readings
- Aalberg (2013), International TV News, Foreign Affairs Interest and Public Knowledge
- Cinelli et al. (2021), The Echo Chamber Effect on Social Media
- Prior (2015), How Increasing Media Choice Widens Gaps in Political Knowledge and Turnout
- Stroud (2008), Revisiting the Concept of Selective Exposure
Practice material
- Application class I: integrative exercises on media, political actors, and citizens, designed around the analytical reasoning required in the final assessment.
Fake news and fact-checking
This module examines the contemporary information disorder. It distinguishes misinformation, disinformation, and fake news, asks who is most likely to believe and disseminate false information and conspiracy theories, and evaluates interventions designed to reduce their spread.
A central question is whether fact-checking and corrective information actually work. The readings connect early research on failed corrections to newer experimental evidence on misinformation interventions, partisan sharing, ideological segregation, and the conditions under which fact-checking is most effective.
Main readings
- Arechar et al. (2023), Understanding and Combatting Misinformation
- Freelon & Wells (2020), Disinformation as Political Communication
- Nyhan & Reifler (2010), When Corrections Fail
Additional readings
- Badrinathan (2021), Educative Interventions to Combat Misinformation
- González-Bailón et al. (2023), Asymmetric Ideological Segregation
- Osmundsen et al. (2021), Partisan Polarization and Fake News Sharing on Twitter
- Redlawsk et al. (2010), Do Motivated Reasoners Ever “Get It”?
- Walter et al. (2020), Fact-Checking: A Meta-Analysis of What Works and for Whom
Course material
- Video: Waarom geloof jij fake news? [Why do you believe fake news?]
Emotions and polarization
Political communication does not operate through information alone. This module examines how emotions shape political persuasion and how contemporary communication environments may contribute to polarization.
Students distinguish different dimensions of polarization and consider how emotional political discourse affects citizens. The module also evaluates prominent claims about social-media algorithms and ideological echo chambers: does exposure to like-minded sources polarize citizens, or are the relationships between media choice and polarization more complicated?
Main readings
- Albertson et al. (2019), The Emotional Aspects of Political Persuasion
- Boussalis et al. (2021), Gender, Candidate Emotional Expression, and Voter Reactions
- Guess et al. (2023), How Do Social Media Feed Algorithms Affect Attitudes and Behavior?
- Nyhan et al. (2023), Like-Minded Sources on Facebook Are Prevalent but Not Polarizing
Additional readings
- de Benedictis-Kessner et al. (2019), Persuading the Enemy
- Druckman et al. (2022), (Mis)estimating Affective Polarization
- Fridkin & Gershon (2021), Nothing More Than Feelings?
- Harteveld (2021), Social Sorting and Affective Polarization
- Koudenburg & Kashima (2022), A Polarized Discourse
- Wollebæk et al. (2019), Anger, Fear, and Echo Chambers
Course material
- Video: Kan je als journalist depolariseren? [Can journalists depolarize?]
Populism and political incivility
This guest module, taught by Dr. Ine Goovaerts, examines populism as a form of political communication and the democratic consequences of uncivil political discourse.
The module asks what distinguishes populist communication from populism more broadly, why political actors may rely on simplistic or uncivil rhetoric, and how such communication affects citizens and democratic norms.
Main readings
- Goovaerts & Marien (2020), Uncivil Communication and Simplistic Argumentation
- Jagers & Walgrave (2007), Populism as Political Communication Style — Belgium
Additional readings
- de Vreese et al. (2018), Populism as an Expression of Political Communication
- Mudde (2004), The Populist Zeitgeist
- Muddiman (2017), Personal and Public Levels of Political Incivility
- Mutz & Reeves (2005), The New Videomalaise
Online dissent, mobilization, and repression
Digital media can facilitate political participation and collective action, but they can also create new opportunities for surveillance, censorship, and repression. This module therefore studies the relationship between online communication and offline political conflict.
It asks whether and how social media can mobilize citizens, why governments censor information, and how authoritarian authorities attempt to suppress digital dissent. Cases from Belarus, Russia, and Saudi Arabia illustrate the interaction between online activism and state repression.
Main readings
- Kuznetsova (2023), Social Media Control During the Protests — Belarus and Russia
- Pan & Siegel (2019), How Saudi Crackdowns Fail to Silence Online Dissent — Saudi Arabia
Additional readings
- Corduneanu-Huci & Hamilton (2022), The Political Economy of Censorship
- Earl et al. (2022), The Digital Repression of Social Movements, Protest, and Activism
Course material
- Podcast: Online Dissent, Offline Repression?
Colonial legacies and foreign news
The final substantive module, taught by Peter Verlinden, turns to the representation of colonial history in contemporary news. It places debates about Belgium’s colonial past within the broader study of how international events become news and how journalistic selection shapes representations of foreign societies and conflicts.
The session returns to one of the foundational questions of the course: why do some events become news while others do not, and what are the consequences of those choices for how citizens understand the world?
Main reading
- Galtung & Ruge (1965), The Structure of Foreign News
Practice material
- Application class II: integrative exercises connecting the advanced modules to the foundational theories of political communication.